-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
BUG: Fix for convert_dtypes with mix of int and string #32126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a bit hard to interpret below tests / diff, but does pd.Series([1, 2.0], dtype=object).convert_dtypes() still give Int64?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. Here's the interpretation of the tests for that case:
The code reads:
This means the following:
Series
with[1, 2.0]
as the entries, with dtypeobject
infer_objects
,convert_string
,convert_integer
andconvert_boolean
infer_objects==True
andconvert_integer==True
, result should beInt64
infer_objects==True
andconvert_integer==False
, result should befloat
infer_objects==False
, result is alwaysobject
Prior to this PR, the tests were as follows:
p3) If
convert_integer==True
, result should beInt64
independent of value ofinfer_objects
p4) If
infer_objects==True
andconvert_integer==False
, result should befloat
(same)p5) If
infer_objects==False
andconvert_integer==False
, result isobject
I think the new version is what we want the behavior to be, i.e., if you start with
object
and you don't do the infer-objects step, it remains an object.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, thanks