-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
TST: XFAIL Travis read_html tests #30544
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jbrockmendel
merged 7 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
alimcmaster1:mcmali-html-tests
Dec 31, 2019
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2d4dd51
XFAIL Tests
alimcmaster1 2768e2c
XFAIL Tests
alimcmaster1 8acd4f0
Update as per brock suggestion
alimcmaster1 9cab2ad
unpin beautiful soup version
alimcmaster1 574723f
Dont xfail for bs4 < 4.8.0
alimcmaster1 804560f
Remove slow tests from allowed failures
alimcmaster1 7faa5ef
black pandas
alimcmaster1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did you change this from the decorator in response to my comment? if so, thats not what i meant. the decorator is preferred, but without the
strict=False
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah just want to xfail one particular parameterization -
bs4
and the parameterization is at class scope - agree decorator is usually preferred.Updated now - think its easiest to do this in the function itself for this case - unless you know a more elegant way?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just seen I can potentially go for the same approach as you did here https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/30521/files? Will update unless you think otherwise?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if the test doesnt use the class fixture(s), could it just be moved out of the class?
If not then the approach in 30521 would be my preference, yes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some class fixtures are used so easier to keep where is. Updated - thanks!