Skip to content

CLN: Old string formatting: .format() -> f #30408

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

DorAmram
Copy link
Contributor

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Dec 22, 2019

Hello @DorAmram! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻

Comment last updated at 2019-12-22 18:03:07 UTC

Copy link
Contributor

@topper-123 topper-123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, a single issue.

root=root, dirname=dirname, parentdir_prefix=parentdir_prefix
)
f"""guessing rootdir is '{root}', but '{dirname}'
doesn't start with prefix '{parentdir_prefix}'"""
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't use triple-quoted strings, it's not the same as two single-quoted strings.

@topper-123 topper-123 added this to the 1.0 milestone Dec 22, 2019
@topper-123 topper-123 added Code Style Code style, linting, code_checks and removed Clean labels Dec 23, 2019
@alimcmaster1
Copy link
Member

Hmm I think this file is autogenerated as per @jbrockmendel comments here #29518 (comment)

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Dec 23, 2019

yeah we can leave this one alone, do we have a check for .format usage in checks? (prob not yet)

@alimcmaster1
Copy link
Member

yeah we can leave this one alone, do we have a check for .format usage in checks? (prob not yet)

Not yet there are still 200+ files to tackle.
grep -l -R -e '%s' -e '%d' -e '\.format(' --include=*.{py,pyx} pandas/

If we want to add a check now we can do - and users remove the file from exclude list once done?
(Would help confirm all instances of .format have been removed in the PR for a file)

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

grepping for .format( will be complicated by the fact that we have 6 places where we def format\(. But we can worry about that later. This PR is non-actionable, closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Code Style Code style, linting, code_checks
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants