-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
REF: make _aggregate_series_pure_python extraction behave like the cython version #29641
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
daaddad
REF: make _aggregate_series_pure_python extraction behave like the cy…
jbrockmendel 18bb6c9
blackify
jbrockmendel 201bc27
add tests
jbrockmendel f4799aa
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into fa…
jbrockmendel 61f32e5
added test
jbrockmendel 2f96ac7
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into fa…
jbrockmendel fb9f171
avoid _values getattr pattern
jbrockmendel 30c1245
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into fa…
jbrockmendel d542515
todo comment
jbrockmendel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you just do
res = np.array(res)[0]
? orres = res.item()
(though I think we have deprecated.item()
, but are bringing it back.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
np.array
won't work because itll lose the timezone. im thinkingnext(iter(res))
with a comment saying its often equivalent tores[0]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think
.item()
would be good here as wellThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
.item()
will be good if/when we un-deprecate itThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is the current
next(iter(res))
acceptable for the time being?extract_array(res)[0]
would also work.I'm eager to see this go in because I think we can get rid of a bunch more _try_cast calls
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yep just mark it with the issue (or fix me) so it’s clear
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
commented