-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
REF: avoid result=None case in _python_agg_general #29499
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
pandas/core/groupby/groupby.py
Outdated
@@ -898,6 +898,11 @@ def _python_agg_general(self, func, *args, **kwargs): | |||
# iterate through "columns" ex exclusions to populate output dict | |||
output = {} | |||
for name, obj in self._iterate_slices(): | |||
if self.grouper.ngroups == 0: | |||
# agg_series below assumes ngroups > 0 | |||
# 3 test cases get here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: somewhat on the fence regarding the necessity and usefulness of this comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fair enough. its for my own reference in trying to move these checks earlier
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similar comment on another PR but would ideally not special case things like this in groupby functions. Is there an actual issue in allowing this to follow the same code paths as when ngroups is non-zero?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WillAyd that goal is the reason for the "3 test cases" comment (which I'll remove). I want to identify the cases that get here and make this check unnecessary. But its much clearer to do this check and not end up with None
on L914 and not be clear on how that happened.
thanks |
cc @WillAyd @jreback, orthogonal to other groupby PRs.