Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[WIP] Annotate DataFrame (Part 3) #28575
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Annotate DataFrame (Part 3) #28575
Changes from 2 commits
c642cf7
035d28a
0bbd370
a640588
d1e92f9
cc767b3
fd5ddd5
ca64736
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should include
np.ndarray
in the signature here. Applicable to the rest below as wellThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alright.
Added some types without paying much attention, will take a closer later.
Btw I am guessing if type of
other
isSeries
, return type will beSeries
too, similar forDataFrame
andnp.ndarray
, how do I indicate that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A TypeVar would make the function generic (i.e. the return type would match
other
if the same TypeVar is used for both) but unfortunately I don't think that is how this is actually implementedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, pretty sure saw something like that in the docstring. But did this in a hurry(thats why draft PR), a bit busy. Will take a closer look as soon as I can.