Skip to content

CLN: small ops cleanup #28379

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 11, 2019
Merged

CLN: small ops cleanup #28379

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 11, 2019

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@WillAyd WillAyd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor question but I think lgtm

@@ -672,9 +671,6 @@ def na_op(x, y):
if is_object_dtype(x.dtype):
result = comp_method_OBJECT_ARRAY(op, x, y)

elif is_datetimelike_v_numeric(x, y):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The removal here is just coupled with some of the other items you've been working on to clean up the datetimelike ops right?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Trying to split cleanup changes off from bigger changes in preparation for a non-trivial refactor to fix arithmetic performance. This check is no longer necessary; I think it was put in place because of older numpy behavior.

@WillAyd WillAyd added the Clean label Sep 11, 2019
@WillAyd WillAyd added this to the 1.0 milestone Sep 11, 2019
Copy link
Member

@WillAyd WillAyd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm - let's see what others think

@jreback jreback merged commit 3cf1757 into pandas-dev:master Sep 11, 2019
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Sep 11, 2019

thanks @jbrockmendel

@simonjayhawkins
Copy link
Member

thanks @jbrockmendel

@jreback problems with ci at the moment with checks and docs, you may want to hold off merging https://dev.azure.com/pandas-dev/pandas/_build/results?buildId=17289

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Sep 11, 2019

thanks @simonjayhawkins

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the faster10 branch September 11, 2019 14:27
proost pushed a commit to proost/pandas that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2019
proost pushed a commit to proost/pandas that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants