-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
BUG: fix+test op(NaT, ndarray), also simplify #27807
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
pandas/_libs/tslibs/nattype.pyx
Outdated
@@ -103,61 +106,102 @@ cdef class _NaT(datetime): | |||
if ndim == -1: | |||
return _nat_scalar_rules[op] | |||
|
|||
if util.is_array(other): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you make these if/elif/else
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changed+green
# TODO: the integer behavior is deprecated, remove it | ||
return c_NaT | ||
|
||
elif util.is_array(other): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what if there is a tz?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is specifically for ndarray, so there cant be a tz
@jreback gentle ping; a few open PRs are blockers for test consolidation etc |
will try over weekend |
("datetime64[ns]", roperator.radd, "datetime64[ns]"), | ||
("datetime64[ns]", operator.sub, "timedelta64[ns]"), | ||
("datetime64[ns]", roperator.rsub, "timedelta64[ns]"), | ||
("timedelta64[ns]", operator.add, "datetime64[ns]"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't these last for yield timedelta64[ns]?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No.
dt64, radd --> dt64 + Nat --> only valid if NaT is treated as td64 --> dt64
dt64, sub --> NaT - dt64 --> only valid if NaT is treated as dt64 --> td64
dt64, rsub --> dt64 - NaT --> valid either way, default to treat as dt64 --> td64
td64, add --> NaT + td64 --> valid either way, defalt to treat as dt64 --> dt64
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, yeah these rules are ok, but if you can put them down somewhere explicity in the code
No description provided.