Skip to content

[WIP] Improve CI/CD pipeline performance #27804

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

bhavaniravi
Copy link
Contributor

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

Out of curiosity, how big is the perf difference?

@bhavaniravi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Out of curiosity, how big is the perf difference?

It is WIP. WIll know once I make some progress.

@gfyoung gfyoung added the CI Continuous Integration label Aug 9, 2019
Copy link
Member

@WillAyd WillAyd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems logical but does the latest update actually change anything? Quick eye test seems similar to the rest of CI

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ New features

.. ipython:: python

df = DataFrame(np.random.randn(5, 3), columns = ['A','B','C'])
df = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randn(5, 3), columns = ['A','B','C'])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you revert changes to this file?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The doc build fails due to an import error

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Sep 8, 2019

does this change perf? can you merge master as well

@bhavaniravi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@WillAyd @jreback yes, it is not reflecting on the performance improvement. I was off a couple of weeks now I'm back on. Will check it

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Oct 6, 2019

@bhavaniravi if you want to continue on this, pls merge master and post a comparison of before / after.

@WillAyd
Copy link
Member

WillAyd commented Oct 22, 2019

I think this is stale or not really giving the results we are after, so closing. @bhavaniravi if you disagree ping and can reopen for sure

Thanks as always!

@WillAyd WillAyd closed this Oct 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI Continuous Integration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CI: Use all available cores in the CI
5 participants