Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix 'observed' kwarg not doing anything on SeriesGroupBy #26463
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix 'observed' kwarg not doing anything on SeriesGroupBy #26463
Changes from 11 commits
a5d6d1a
41f49f4
2575c41
1c02d9f
7350472
0a949d5
0e9f473
1ef54f4
cd481ad
a515caf
ff42dd7
c22875c
cc0b725
629a144
e4fda22
8cfa4a1
db176de
d520952
3591dbc
f97c8a1
d5c9c40
ad16db8
7c525a1
e6bca5e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you update the doc-string with Parameters / Results; type things if you can
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can this be more generally used in groupby/test_categorical.py?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would have to keep doing
.astype('category')
in each of my tests for this. Either that, or derive another fixture fromthree_group
, so it would not decrease the number of fixtures.I also preferred literal values to random ones for easier equality checks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it’s not about decreasing the number of fixtures
but rather reusing them across tests as much as possible
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
literal values are fine (u could just replace the random with fixed values)
changing existing to accommodate new tests is better than rolling new
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you just parametrize this instead of using the dict this way?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also using MultiIndex.from_* methods would be preferable for readability
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be better to just use literal values here instead of deriving via these expressions; it would be easier to read and could be passed in via parametrization instead of using this local dict
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment