Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix 'observed' kwarg not doing anything on SeriesGroupBy #26463
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix 'observed' kwarg not doing anything on SeriesGroupBy #26463
Changes from 10 commits
a5d6d1a
41f49f4
2575c41
1c02d9f
7350472
0a949d5
0e9f473
1ef54f4
cd481ad
a515caf
ff42dd7
c22875c
cc0b725
629a144
e4fda22
8cfa4a1
db176de
d520952
3591dbc
f97c8a1
d5c9c40
ad16db8
7c525a1
e6bca5e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you update the doc-string with Parameters / Results; type things if you can
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can this be more generally used in groupby/test_categorical.py?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would have to keep doing
.astype('category')
in each of my tests for this. Either that, or derive another fixture fromthree_group
, so it would not decrease the number of fixtures.I also preferred literal values to random ones for easier equality checks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it’s not about decreasing the number of fixtures
but rather reusing them across tests as much as possible
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
literal values are fine (u could just replace the random with fixed values)
changing existing to accommodate new tests is better than rolling new
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since 'a' and 'b' are categories can you use distinct names? 'foo' and 'bar' are fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question on naming - what does
partial
mean here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By
partial
I mean that it's not a full product of index level values. For example, if first level has['x', 'y']
and second level['a', 'b']
, then a complete index is[('x', 'a'), ('x', 'b'), ('y', 'a'), ('y', 'b')]
and I construct that with.from_product
, and if not all combinations are in, then it'spartial
(for example,[('x', 'a'), ('x', 'b'), ('y', 'a')]
where('y', 'b')
is not in.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm OK. I find this rather confusing though that the determination as to whether or not this is "partial" is done entirely outside the scope of the fixture (i.e. it is up to the injected test to only partially align).
Is there not a way to make the fixture self contained to provide a Series or Frame instead? May require a rewrite of your tests but I think this is just confusing