Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ENH: Support nested renaming / selection #26399
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: Support nested renaming / selection #26399
Changes from 1 commit
aa43cf6
8bd8e31
10c8f40
2e52653
06a86ec
9e636c1
14f66e6
2c3d11a
cdf9373
2c544f0
c0cd575
386cca1
2f6e1dc
6d8a18a
6c1f567
bcc63f5
769a909
1da90d4
a028f48
0ddd51f
42e69a1
769d7d3
1cee0e2
6369eb1
02d7169
eb9ba8f
7df14d7
cf8db51
9501e82
d65afe4
25dca1a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm couldn't we just do this now since
order
keeps track of that for us?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't recall if I checked, but I thought we needed this to ensure that the order of the arguments is respected in
_python_agg_general
.