-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
PERF: changed default value of cache parameter to True in to_datetime function #26043
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 18 commits
Commits
Show all changes
22 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c60ad2f
changed default value of cache parameter to True
anmyachev 1b71f8c
added new entry for cache changing
anmyachev 4617762
added whatsnew note in the performance section
anmyachev 4fcb04a
removed: 'cache : boolean, default False'
anmyachev db0fe62
added '.. versionchanged'
anmyachev 7d9f0ef
added benchmark
anmyachev c51f00d
added heuristic to decrease slowdowns for unique arrays
anmyachev 417e005
corrected the code due to the reviewers comments
anmyachev ed0725e
added errors message; added tests
anmyachev 14ef1f2
fix bug when 'check_count' == 0
anmyachev 0c2aaea
added escape symbols
anmyachev 0fde7c8
attempt to improve perfomance
anmyachev c74597a
fix bug
anmyachev 98e18a8
fixed problems found by review
anmyachev 201e7fc
removed excess conversion 'to_numpy'
anmyachev cc29172
Merge branch 'master' into PR_TOOL_MERGE_PR_26043
jreback 209bb83
fix up bencharks
jreback 1c78f50
lint
TomAugspurger 7dffc3e
lint
jreback 72cc609
Merge branch 'master' into PR_TOOL_MERGE_PR_26043
jreback 40114b7
patch for cache with bad dates
jreback ebc8815
better unique
jreback File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@TomAugspurger ok method of handling ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although... I worry it would incorrectly catch a TypeError in the function? The other way might be to check
pandas.__version__
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, let me see what i can do