Skip to content

Incorrect example in wide_to_long docstring #26010

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

sanjusci
Copy link

@sanjusci sanjusci commented Apr 6, 2019

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 6, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #26010 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26010      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.82%   91.81%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         175      175              
  Lines       52551    52551              
==========================================
- Hits        48256    48252       -4     
- Misses       4295     4299       +4
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.38% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#single 40.72% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/core/reshape/melt.py 97.5% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/io/gbq.py 75% <0%> (-12.5%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 96.79% <0%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a1fee91...d507f9d. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 6, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #26010 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26010      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.82%   91.81%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         175      175              
  Lines       52551    52551              
==========================================
- Hits        48256    48252       -4     
- Misses       4295     4299       +4
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.38% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#single 40.72% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/core/reshape/melt.py 97.5% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/io/gbq.py 75% <0%> (-12.5%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 96.79% <0%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a1fee91...5d160ab. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@WillAyd WillAyd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are a few more things in the original PR that we would want to include here, namely adding this module to the CI checks. Can you do that here as well?

@WillAyd WillAyd added the Docs label Apr 6, 2019
@WillAyd
Copy link
Member

WillAyd commented Apr 10, 2019

Can you check CI failures? Related to change

@WillAyd
Copy link
Member

WillAyd commented May 3, 2019

superseded by #26273

@WillAyd WillAyd closed this May 3, 2019
@sanjusci sanjusci deleted the 25733 branch May 17, 2019 06:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect example in wide_to_long docstring
2 participants