Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DOC: Add expanded index descriptors for specifying for RangeIndex-as-metadata in Parquet file schema #25709
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC: Add expanded index descriptors for specifying for RangeIndex-as-metadata in Parquet file schema #25709
Changes from 3 commits
766aa50
2c8431c
931ca2c
d3cd904
8f6d6a7
10d1e86
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#25720 was just merged, prob could just change this (though of course implementing this for <0.25.x will still require this)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this actually correct? (although it was already there in the doc before, to be clear)
This seems to indicate that an index always gets a
__index_level_x__
name as thefield_name
, regardless of the name it has (so not only if it is None).But this is not what I see from a quick test:
(I remember that we had a discussion about this before, but can't directly remember the outcome of that)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It appears that the current behavior is to use the name of the index if it does not conflict with any of the data columns. So we should update these docs to reflect that