DOC: clean-up of 0.24.2 whatsnew file

[jorisvandenbossche]

No description provided.

[jreback]

a more general comment. I find the 'Fixed Regressions' section way harder to read than our separated Bug Fixes section (e.g. by area). Ideally should either reorg that and have sub-topics, or just combine them to one (maybe have a way of flagging a regression vs a bug).

[TomAugspurger]

We could use an HTML label like scikit-learn does in https://scikit-learn.org/stable/whats_new.html.

…

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:52 AM Jeff Reback ***@***.***> wrote: a more general comment. I find the 'Fixed Regressions' section way harder to read than our separated Bug Fixes section (e.g. by area). Ideally should either reorg that and have sub-topics, or just combine them to one (maybe have a way of flagging a regression vs a bug). — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#25660 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQHItBkBOktQT9aImo2TuAz7solnSMfks5vVm20gaJpZM4bosLO> .

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #25660 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #25660   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.29%   91.29%           
=======================================
  Files         173      173           
  Lines       52961    52961           
=======================================
  Hits        48350    48350           
  Misses       4611     4611

Flag	Coverage Δ
#multiple	89.86% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
#single	41.73% <ø> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c4fa3c9...a7d5890. Read the comment docs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #25660 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #25660      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.29%   91.29%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         173      173              
  Lines       52961    52961              
==========================================
+ Hits        48349    48350       +1     
+ Misses       4612     4611       -1

Flag	Coverage Δ
#multiple	89.86% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
#single	41.73% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pandas/util/testing.py	89.08% <0%> (+0.09%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 21769e9...10b3a8d. Read the comment docs.

[jorisvandenbossche]

I personally like the separate regressions section, but they indeed could also be subdivided (the labels of sklearn are also nice, but they group everything (also enhancements) per topic).
But given that this PR was only cleaning up the whitespace for what is already there, going to leave that discussion for another time.