-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
DEPS: Bump numpy to 1.13.3 #25554
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
DEPS: Bump numpy to 1.13.3 #25554
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
25 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bcaf944
DEPS: bump numpy minimum to 1.13.3
h-vetinari ca28cdb
Fixes
h-vetinari 4830f49
Enforce higher bottleneck version
h-vetinari 49e8a06
Shift mpl pin away from coverage job
h-vetinari 01e2b06
Clean up scipy cruft
h-vetinari a3e09c2
Reshuffle mpl pins
h-vetinari 27bf206
More numpy cruft
h-vetinari 64fc701
Fix order and pin in azure compat job
h-vetinari 327ef30
Reformulate version bump in whatsnew, add lowest version pins where m…
h-vetinari f3f7d2b
clean some old sqlalchemy code
h-vetinari 5f2e19b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bump_numpy
h-vetinari e3d9f6e
Review (jreback)
h-vetinari 182d67c
Fixes
h-vetinari d0bb930
Lint
h-vetinari 3ea9cd8
Update whatsnew issues references
h-vetinari ffd86ff
split table in whatsnew (review jreback)
h-vetinari fb449ea
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bump_numpy
h-vetinari a7d7190
Remove left-over comment
h-vetinari aad68c6
Remove cython from deps in whatsnew
h-vetinari fa674e3
Fix wording
h-vetinari 8005679
Reinstate better regexes
h-vetinari b4288e9
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bump_numpy
h-vetinari e0f8a6d
Review (jreback)
h-vetinari 445a9a2
Simplify regex
h-vetinari 20ad5a5
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into bump_numpy
h-vetinari File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this fails the wheel building CI. pls don't revert this, I don't want to debug this problem. Just make this MUCH simpler so it will pretty much always pass.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It will not fail the wheel building CI. I actually checked the wheel builder failures from #25867 before giving my review in #25874.
In case you don't have time to read the review, the original code in #25752 has an
if _np_version_under1p14 else
-switch that turned out to be wrong, while the regex here only uses a|
-conjunction.Neither did I, but I've had to for a passing CI. Please have a look at the actual regexes. What I've written is a proper superset of the current regexes (again, now that the switch has been turned into
"|"
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.