Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ENH: Added max_gap keyword for series.interpolate #25141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: Added max_gap keyword for series.interpolate #25141
Changes from 3 commits
5e4b2ee
b752602
839b11a
fcdc4e4
20b70b7
3cb371e
8c6ff7a
4aaf8dc
1f0406f
eaacefd
f274d16
c72acdb
e0aee3a
af15eaf
12d2e5b
c25d1f8
4d40722
255518e
2015e84
4d7b0f1
cbf7388
5128b9d
3c55e1e
f9e4044
d1bbcd6
21b3091
c96c604
bd84fc9
908ffe5
380ef7c
5a1718a
16755bd
b58d721
aa58ffa
ae16124
28b442c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the benefit to making this a separate closure?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no real reason. Maybe at some point I thought the function definition would make things clearer.
Should I just put the content of the function in-line starting at L350?