-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
API/ERR: allow iterators in df.set_index & improve errors #24984
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 32 commits
3e01681
1b71e68
caeb125
8bd5340
3c8b69a
cdfd86a
d76ecfb
d2ffb81
5863678
0a7d783
087d4f1
794f61d
0761633
c58e8b6
29fa8c0
b5c8fa8
5590433
7767ff7
37c12d0
2c4eaea
6c78816
2ccd9a9
b03c43b
ea10359
ca17895
a401eea
f4deacc
125b0ca
9bfcfde
6838613
ca2ac60
87bd0a6
759b369
40f1aaa
ecc7d03
5f99b15
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Other Enhancements | |
|
||
- :meth:`Timestamp.replace` now supports the ``fold`` argument to disambiguate DST transition times (:issue:`25017`) | ||
- :meth:`DataFrame.at_time` and :meth:`Series.at_time` now support :meth:`datetime.time` objects with timezones (:issue:`24043`) | ||
- :meth:`DataFrame.set_index` now works for instances of ``abc.Iterator``, provided their output is of the same length as the calling frame (:issue:`22484`, :issue:`24984`) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this is just a code reorg yes? with slightly better error messages in some cases? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @jreback: The custom classes were re-enabled by #25085 (which took over the tests from this PR), which closed the regression #24969, and has a corresponding whatsnew note. I guess the issue didn't get closed yet, because I only noted that #25085 was an alternative to this PR (at the time, for solving #24969), but didn't add the "closes #24969" explicitly - sorry. |
||
- | ||
|
||
.. _whatsnew_0250.api_breaking: | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah pls revert all of this