Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ensure TDA.__init__ validates freq #24666
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure TDA.__init__ validates freq #24666
Changes from 7 commits
e2a63c5
09c2a37
9097bf0
86c5658
3d9cd7d
eba0c51
ab0c928
37352bb
f273a2c
3e9eaa1
02acf9d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do these actually make a difference? I am -1 on changing these, this is the reason we have the is_* routines
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The is_foo_dtype call takes about 16x longer than this check. Tom says these checks are the main source of his perf concern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As an alternative,
sequence_to_td64ns
could take afastpath
argument when we know thatdata
is an ndarray of the correct dtype. Then you could have (roughly)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or use the even-faster _simple_new? fastpath is a pattern we're still trying to deprecate elsewhere
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am -1 on actually changing to the in [....] checks. The entire point is consistency in use. I am not convinced these are actual perf issues in the real world. micro seconds on a single construction pales in comparision to inconsistent code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you can use
_simple_new
then great.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
_simple_new
cannot be used, as that does ~zero validation on the input.We're deprecating that from public methods. sequnce_to_td64ns isn't public is it?