Skip to content

Pytables support for hierarchical keys #2401

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

jreback
Copy link
Contributor

@jreback jreback commented Dec 1, 2012

GH #2391

support for keys of the form: foo/bar/bah
includes docs & tests

min_itemsize can be passed as a dict
support removal of sub-stores by a higer level key
	(e.g. store.remove('df') will remove everything in the '/df' namespace and below)
access to namespaces is ABSOLUTE (and a '/' will be assumed if not provided), e.g. store.get('df') will get '/df')
  thus is backwards compatible
slight change to the __repr__ to show the paths
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Dec 1, 2012

ready for merging

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Dec 1, 2012

good to go - I am sure that I will find more bugs...but will add to the issue...

@wesm
Copy link
Member

wesm commented Dec 1, 2012

Cool.

Aside: could you be careful about not merging master into feature branches? it makes the commit history very unclean

@wesm
Copy link
Member

wesm commented Dec 1, 2012

I was able to get these commits to cherry-pick cleanly. Merged

@wesm wesm closed this Dec 1, 2012
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Dec 1, 2012

yes np

On Dec 1, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Wes McKinney [email protected] wrote:

Cool.

Aside: could you be careful about not merging master into feature branches? it makes the commit history very unclean


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants