Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
REF/TST: Fix remaining DatetimeArray with DateOffset arithmetic ops #23789
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
REF/TST: Fix remaining DatetimeArray with DateOffset arithmetic ops #23789
Changes from all commits
986fdbc
fd75931
66c866b
4dc17e2
da3459c
348a8b2
dd7e873
c8351bc
23a25d1
b4ae288
d1ebdbf
711ee61
9338b5b
5fbe9c8
c7db0e4
a4f9733
b50fedf
7e951e4
317e1e7
5de2d42
5433a71
dc137f3
2c65f3b
31c5c0b
c3d775e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you could simplify a lot of these checks if also pass
inferred_freq
(optionally to._validate_frequencey
, and for example handle the fact that result could be a scalar (just ignore the validation) / sequence (do the validation)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ill take a look at this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you're right that we can change this from a 3-4 liner into a 1-2 liner. Since this pattern shows up in all four of TDA/DTA/TDI/DTI constructors (actually, future tense for DTA), I'd like to do change them all at once in a dedicated follow-up