Skip to content

TST: Empty Series.reindex with tz-aware dtype #23480

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 4, 2018
Merged

TST: Empty Series.reindex with tz-aware dtype #23480

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ab05b87
:TST: Empty Series.reindex with tz-aware dtype
Nov 4, 2018
ac5cd2d
move test
Nov 4, 2018
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions doc/source/whatsnew/v0.24.0.txt
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1197,6 +1197,7 @@ Indexing
- The traceback from a ``KeyError`` when asking ``.loc`` for a single missing label is now shorter and more clear (:issue:`21557`)
- When ``.ix`` is asked for a missing integer label in a :class:`MultiIndex` with a first level of integer type, it now raises a ``KeyError``, consistently with the case of a flat :class:`Int64Index`, rather than falling back to positional indexing (:issue:`21593`)
- Bug in :meth:`DatetimeIndex.reindex` when reindexing a tz-naive and tz-aware :class:`DatetimeIndex` (:issue:`8306`)
- Bug in :meth:`Series.reindex` when reindexing an empty series with a ``datetime64[ns, tz]`` dtype (:issue:`20869`)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't call this a bug (or add any kind of whatsnew) when the test you added to break pandas passes on CI. 😉 🎉

Or was this broken in 0.23.4?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't look broken in 0.23.4, but there was a never a whatsnew note that this was fixed.

- Bug in :class:`DataFrame` when setting values with ``.loc`` and a timezone aware :class:`DatetimeIndex` (:issue:`11365`)
- ``DataFrame.__getitem__`` now accepts dictionaries and dictionary keys as list-likes of labels, consistently with ``Series.__getitem__`` (:issue:`21294`)
- Fixed ``DataFrame[np.nan]`` when columns are non-unique (:issue:`21428`)
Expand Down
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions pandas/tests/series/indexing/test_alter_index.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -459,6 +459,13 @@ def test_reindex_datetimeindexes_tz_naive_and_aware():
s.reindex(newidx, method='ffill')


def test_reindex_empty_series_tz_dtype():
# GH 20869
result = Series(dtype='datetime64[ns, UTC]').reindex([0, 1])
expected = Series([pd.NaT] * 2, dtype='datetime64[ns, UTC]')
tm.assert_equal(result, expected)


def test_rename():
# GH 17407
s = Series(range(1, 6), index=pd.Index(range(2, 7), name='IntIndex'))
Expand Down