Skip to content

BUG: Fix ndarray + DataFrame ops #23114

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Oct 14, 2018
Merged

BUG: Fix ndarray + DataFrame ops #23114

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
c158048
Fix ndarray with frame op
jbrockmendel Oct 10, 2018
a28302a
typo fixup
jbrockmendel Oct 12, 2018
8183c20
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into ar…
jbrockmendel Oct 12, 2018
4e84e53
set __array_priority__
jbrockmendel Oct 12, 2018
d280cf1
update tests
jbrockmendel Oct 13, 2018
d62a6c8
fix test assertion
jbrockmendel Oct 13, 2018
afd53e0
update test
jbrockmendel Oct 13, 2018
bc55de7
un-xfail now-passing test
jbrockmendel Oct 13, 2018
c0100b2
whatsnew
jbrockmendel Oct 14, 2018
ed7174c
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into ar…
jbrockmendel Oct 14, 2018
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions pandas/core/generic.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1799,6 +1799,13 @@ def __array__(self, dtype=None):
return com.values_from_object(self)

def __array_wrap__(self, result, context=None):
if (context is not None and context[1] is not None and
len(context[1]) == 2 and context[1][1] is self and
isinstance(context[1][0], np.ndarray)):
# TODO: Can we return NotImplemented earlier? By the time we
# get here we've calculated `result`, which may not be cheap
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shoyer any idea if there is a more elegant way to do this?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What are you trying to fix here? Generally I recommend avoiding __array_wrap__ if possible... __array_ufunc__ is a much more complete interface. To be honest, I'm not even sure if returning NotImplemented from __array_wrap__ has well-defined behavior.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What are you trying to fix here?

#22537. In master ndarray[int] + DataFrame[timedelta64[ns]] treats the ndarray as timedelta64 instead of raising TypeError.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not familiar with exactly how pandas implements binary ops, but this doesn't look like the right place to fix this.

The problem is likely in the DataFrame.__radd__ or DataFrame.__array_ufunc__ method (which NumPy calls instead of __radd__ if defined, see here for details and recommendations)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. Looks like its extra-simple: Series and Index both define __array_priority__ but DataFrame does not.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow, I'm kind of surprised we never defined DataFrame.__array_priority__ :)

return NotImplemented

d = self._construct_axes_dict(self._AXIS_ORDERS, copy=False)
return self._constructor(result, **d).__finalize__(self)

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pandas/tests/arithmetic/test_numeric.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ def test_numeric_arr_rdiv_tdscalar(self, three_days, numeric_idx, box):
if box is not pd.Index and broken:
# np.timedelta64(3, 'D') / 2 == np.timedelta64(1, 'D')
raise pytest.xfail("timedelta64 not converted to nanos; "
"Tick division not imlpemented")
"Tick division not implemented")

expected = TimedeltaIndex(['3 Days', '36 Hours'])

Expand Down
3 changes: 0 additions & 3 deletions pandas/tests/arithmetic/test_object.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -140,9 +140,6 @@ def test_objarr_radd_str_invalid(self, dtype, data, box):
operator.sub, ops.rsub])
def test_objarr_add_invalid(self, op, box):
# invalid ops
if box is pd.DataFrame and op is ops.radd:
pytest.xfail(reason="DataFrame op incorrectly casts the np.array"
"case to M8[ns]")

obj_ser = tm.makeObjectSeries()
obj_ser.name = 'objects'
Expand Down