BUG: Dont include deleted rows from sas7bdat files (#15963) #22650
Conversation
|
Hello @troels! Thanks for submitting the PR.
|
troels
force-pushed
the
dont-include-deleted-rows-sas
branch
3 times, most recently
from
1b1e8ec to
b8696f9
Compare
troels
changed the title
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #22650 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.17% 92.17% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 169 169
Lines 50708 50721 +13
==========================================
+ Hits 46740 46754 +14
+ Misses 3968 3967 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
Haven't looked in detail due to size of PR but I noticed your original post only mentions one issue whereas the PR references 3 in the whatsnew. Is that intentional or have you simply pulled in some other concurrent developments accidentally? |
|
Hi @WillAyd I made a separate PR #22628 for the two first commits. This one I though was large enough to have its own PR, but as there was a dependency on the first two commits I continued this PR from the branch #22628 had sprung from. |
troels
force-pushed
the
dont-include-deleted-rows-sas
branch
3 times, most recently
from
db6ba8b to
69779d5
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #22650 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.18% 92.18% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 169 169
Lines 50812 50821 +9
==========================================
+ Hits 46842 46851 +9
Misses 3970 3970
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
troels
force-pushed
the
dont-include-deleted-rows-sas
branch
from
69779d5 to
fcb1699
Compare
Sas7bdat may contain rows which are actually deleted. If the page_type has bit 128 set, there is a bitmap following the normal row data with a bit set for a given row if it has been deleted. Use that information to not include deleted rows in the resulting dataframe.
| page_type = self.current_page_type | ||
| subheader_pointers_length = \ | ||
| self.subheader_pointer_length * self.current_page_subheaders_count | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can you add some comments in here
| self.calculate_deleted_rows_bitmap_offset() | ||
|
|
||
| cdef bint is_row_deleted(self, int row_number): | ||
| cdef: |
|
Can you address comments and merge master? |
|
can you merge master and address comments |
|
Closing as stale. Ping if you'd like to continue |
|
This would be pretty useful as the issue makes read_sas unusable for a lot of sas datasets. |
Sas7bdat files may contain rows which are actually deleted.
After reverse engineering the file format a bit, I found that
if the page_type has bit 7 set, there is a bitmap following
the normal row data with a bit set for a given row if it has been
deleted. Use that information to not include deleted rows in
the resulting dataframe.
This PR is built on top of #22628
I've added two test-cases one from the issue and another constructed
example, which tests parsing on different page types and across multiple sas7bdat-pages.
The constructed example is rather large, mainly to have a test case where the data
flows across several pages.
git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff