-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
DEPR: Error with ambiguous groupby strings #22415
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jreback
merged 1 commit into
pandas-dev:master
from
forking-repos:groupby-ambiguous-error
Aug 22, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | ||
import numpy as np | ||
import pytest | ||
|
||
from pandas import DataFrame, Index | ||
from pandas import DataFrame | ||
from pandas.errors import PerformanceWarning | ||
from pandas.util import testing as tm | ||
from pandas.util.testing import assert_frame_equal | ||
|
@@ -93,34 +93,3 @@ def test_sort_column_level_and_index_label( | |
assert_frame_equal(result, expected) | ||
else: | ||
assert_frame_equal(result, expected) | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_sort_values_column_index_level_precedence(): | ||
# GH 14353, when a string passed as the `by` parameter | ||
# matches a column and an index level the column takes | ||
# precedence | ||
|
||
# Construct DataFrame with index and column named 'idx' | ||
idx = Index(np.arange(1, 7), name='idx') | ||
df = DataFrame({'A': np.arange(11, 17), | ||
'idx': np.arange(6, 0, -1)}, | ||
index=idx) | ||
|
||
# Sorting by 'idx' should sort by the idx column and raise a | ||
# FutureWarning | ||
with tm.assert_produces_warning(FutureWarning): | ||
result = df.sort_values(by='idx') | ||
|
||
# This should be equivalent to sorting by the 'idx' index level in | ||
# descending order | ||
expected = df.sort_index(level='idx', ascending=False) | ||
assert_frame_equal(result, expected) | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. are these sufficiently covered as testing that they raise? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Raise, but we already have coverage. |
||
# Perform same test with MultiIndex | ||
df_multi = df.set_index('A', append=True) | ||
|
||
with tm.assert_produces_warning(FutureWarning): | ||
result = df_multi.sort_values(by='idx') | ||
|
||
expected = df_multi.sort_index(level='idx', ascending=False) | ||
assert_frame_equal(result, expected) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should no longer be in a versionadded directive?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we drop
..versionadded
directives from docstrings?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not a docstring, but yes, we do drop them from time to time (but not that often).
However, in this case, what is stated is now not correct anymore. There was no error added in 0.20. So maybe we can also change the 0.20 to 0.24 ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I might just refer to drop it, since it really isn't an add either. Happy to debate semantics 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handled in #22503.