-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
Changes to validate_docstring script to be able to check all docstrings at once #22408
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
datapythonista
merged 13 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
datapythonista:validate_all_docstrings
Oct 13, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b31fc10
Main refactoring of validate_docstrings scripts, so it can be execute…
datapythonista 5d2815f
Fixing errors with introspection
datapythonista 5bb7b9b
Adapting tests to the new format
datapythonista 86327d4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into validate_all_docs…
datapythonista 188f4a3
Addressing comments from the code review
datapythonista 0d25298
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into validate_all_docs…
datapythonista 577308e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into validate_all_docs…
datapythonista 156b997
Merging from master
datapythonista 3a5e7fd
Fixing pep8
datapythonista 1a8aee9
Merge branch 'validate_all_docstrings' of github.com:datapythonista/p…
datapythonista aa4807a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into validate_all_docs…
datapythonista 1d2c5c0
Adding tests to the function that parses api.rst
datapythonista db782fd
Addressing comments from review
datapythonista File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor nit but what does this add? Can't we just do the normal inclusion check against the list instead of joining into a string?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
msg in result['errors']
is different than this, for example'a' in 'foo bar'
isTrue
, buta in ['foo', 'bar']
isFalse
.I think the
.join()
is simpler than another loop, is it what you would do, or you were thinking on the previous case?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No but I thought
msg
would explicitly match one of theerrors
; will take a look more deeply on next review if that assumption is incorrectThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Debugging this locally still don't think the string concatenation is necessary?