Skip to content

REF: No need to delegate to index check of whether an int is an int #21982

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2018
Merged

REF: No need to delegate to index check of whether an int is an int #21982

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
3c07893
REF: No need to delegate to index check of whether an int is an int
toobaz Jul 19, 2018
34cdc8e
TST: test for #21982
toobaz Jul 20, 2018
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
22 changes: 19 additions & 3 deletions pandas/core/indexing.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2124,7 +2124,25 @@ def _getitem_scalar(self, key):
return values

def _validate_integer(self, key, axis):
# return a boolean if we have a valid integer indexer
"""
Check that 'key' is a valid position in the desired axis.

Parameters
----------
key : int
Requested position
axis : int
Desired axis

Returns
-------
None

Raises
------
IndexError
If 'key' is not a valid position in axis 'axis'
"""

ax = self.obj._get_axis(axis)
l = len(ax)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2215,8 +2233,6 @@ def _getitem_axis(self, key, axis=None):

# a single integer
else:
key = self._convert_scalar_indexer(key, axis)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you check if there is any remaining occasion where _convert_scalar_indexer is used for iloc (in principle it shouldn't?). Because if not, _convert_scalar_indexer has some redundant code

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, there is, and it was related to a commit I pushed but then removed, because unfortunately it broke some tests and I don't have time to check them in the next days. So I went for the obvious change only, will add the rest in some other PR (which I think will be quite large, as I will also touch code in indexes).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK. Can you point to where it is currently used? (to have this on record)
Is it worth to add a todo comment there?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll rebase my other PR on this once merged, push it and open an issue referring to it


if not is_integer(key):
raise TypeError("Cannot index by location index with a "
"non-integer key")
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pandas/tests/indexing/test_floats.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ def test_scalar_error(self):
def f():
s.iloc[3.0]
tm.assert_raises_regex(TypeError,
'cannot do positional indexing',
'Cannot index by location index',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

side issue, we have 2 different versions of this error message (the original also happens), so these should be the same (future PR). I don't think we actually need to distinguish them.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already have both messages in the code (I did not write a new message).

The only difference is that now this case raises the correct one.

f)

def f():
Expand Down