Skip to content

BUG: Fix group index calculation to prevent hitting maximum recursion depth (#21524) #21541

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 21, 2018
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions doc/source/whatsnew/v0.23.2.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ Bug Fixes

- Bug in :meth:`Index.get_indexer_non_unique` with categorical key (:issue:`21448`)
- Bug in comparison operations for :class:`MultiIndex` where error was raised on equality / inequality comparison involving a MultiIndex with ``nlevels == 1`` (:issue:`21149`)
- Bug in :func:`DataFrame.duplicated` with a large number of columns causing a 'maximum recursion depth exceeded' (:issue:`21524`).
-

**I/O**
Expand Down
29 changes: 17 additions & 12 deletions pandas/core/sorting.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,7 +52,21 @@ def _int64_cut_off(shape):
return i
return len(shape)

def loop(labels, shape):
def maybe_lift(lab, size):
# promote nan values (assigned -1 label in lab array)
# so that all output values are non-negative
return (lab + 1, size + 1) if (lab == -1).any() else (lab, size)

labels = map(_ensure_int64, labels)
if not xnull:
labels, shape = map(list, zip(*map(maybe_lift, labels, shape)))

labels = list(labels)
shape = list(shape)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you comment on the purpose of the loop

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would try, though I'm not the author of original code - I've just changed it from recursion to loop, so I can't be sure I understand 100% all the nuances here...

# Iteratively process all the labels in chunks sized so less
# than _INT64_MAX unique int ids will be required for each chunk
while True:
# how many levels can be done without overflow:
nlev = _int64_cut_off(shape)

Expand All @@ -74,7 +88,7 @@ def loop(labels, shape):
out[mask] = -1

if nlev == len(shape): # all levels done!
return out
break

# compress what has been done so far in order to avoid overflow
# to retain lexical ranks, obs_ids should be sorted
Expand All @@ -83,16 +97,7 @@ def loop(labels, shape):
labels = [comp_ids] + labels[nlev:]
shape = [len(obs_ids)] + shape[nlev:]

return loop(labels, shape)

def maybe_lift(lab, size): # pormote nan values
return (lab + 1, size + 1) if (lab == -1).any() else (lab, size)

labels = map(_ensure_int64, labels)
if not xnull:
labels, shape = map(list, zip(*map(maybe_lift, labels, shape)))

return loop(list(labels), list(shape))
return out
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does out need a definition outside of the loop? e.g. is it always defined

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is always defined here - out is assigned before the exit from the loop can happen.
And if something (though I don't know what in this case) throw an Exception - we will bypass return alltogether



def get_compressed_ids(labels, sizes):
Expand Down
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions pandas/tests/frame/test_analytics.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1527,6 +1527,23 @@ def test_duplicated_with_misspelled_column_name(self, subset):
with pytest.raises(KeyError):
df.drop_duplicates(subset)

@pytest.mark.slow
def test_duplicated_do_not_fail_on_wide_dataframes(self):
# gh-21524
# Given the wide dataframe with a lot of columns
# with different (important!) values
data = {'col_{0:02d}'.format(i): np.random.randint(0, 1000, 30000)
for i in range(100)}
df = pd.DataFrame(data).T
result = df.duplicated()

# Then duplicates produce the bool pd.Series as a result
# and don't fail during calculation.
# Actual values doesn't matter here, though usually
# it's all False in this case
assert isinstance(result, pd.Series)
assert result.dtype == np.bool

def test_drop_duplicates_with_duplicate_column_names(self):
# GH17836
df = DataFrame([
Expand Down