-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
Accessor registry #20780
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Accessor registry #20780
Conversation
Re-using the _accessors attribute, since nothing seemed to rely on it being a frozenset. Closes pandas-dev#19963
Do we want to document this as the official way to get a list of the registered accessors for an object? |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #20780 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 91.84% 91.84% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 153 153
Lines 49305 49307 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 45284 45286 +2
Misses 4021 4021
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
lgtm. ok to update docs / merge. |
Do you want to use this in eg Dask? |
I think the current preference is for authors to explicitly register their
accessors with Dask as well.
Let's leave it private for now, and if people need it later on we will
document it.
…On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Joris Van den Bossche < ***@***.***> wrote:
Do we want to document this as the official way to get a list of the
registered accessors for an object?
Do you want to use this in eg Dask?
If so, then maybe we should document that.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#20780 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQHIsd868SRfXfGI3BVI_OFQJuo1BVlks5trYLVgaJpZM4TekOV>
.
|
Closes #19963
cc @datapythonista I think this would have solved your issues w/ the validation script.