-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
removed not necessary bn switch decorator on nansum #20481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #20481 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.85% 91.84% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 152 152
Lines 49231 49230 -1
==========================================
- Hits 45220 45215 -5
- Misses 4011 4015 +4
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
should also be on |
oh, now I don't see it so clearly and I'm probably wrong. Nothing has been broken, I was checking the code and I noticed that |
@mmngreco no it IS unecessary since 0.22 (as we compute sum/prod inside pandas only). was just wondering how you detected it. happy to have you remove the one on nansum as well. I don't think there is a test for this that would break, but if you have something would be great. |
I have not found any test for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also don't think you'll find a test where this matters.
Merging later today.
Thanks @mmngreco |
Removed not necessary bottleneck_switch decorator on nansum function like nanprod.