-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
REF: Mock all S3 Tests #20409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
REF: Mock all S3 Tests #20409
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@martindurant does this seem like a reasonable way to test that
read_csv(key, nrows=5)
only triggers S3FS reading part of the object? Do you know of a better way, that's perhaps less reliant on the internals of S3FS?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm afraid I don't have a better method for you, s3fs doesn't keep a log of transactions in any data structure you could access, and the s3file used for the download will have been cleaned up as soon as read_csv is done with it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm OK. Do you know if moto keeps a record anywhere?
I dislike this test since s3fs adding an additional
logger.debug
anywhere, or changing the log message, default bytes size, etc. will break it.boto also has a callback mechanism on
download_file
, but I don't see that option forget_object
. If I can't figure out a way to get that working, I'll try to make the test using the logger a bit less fragile.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Certainly you could look through all log messages captured, not just the last one. Note that you do have access to the exact s3filesystem in S3FileSystem._singleton[0], but I don't see that that helps you in this case.
You could maybe patch
S3File.__exit__
to store the values ofself.loc
andself.end
?