-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
DOC: update docstring validation script #19960
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jorisvandenbossche
merged 5 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
jorisvandenbossche:validate-docstrings
Mar 2, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dfc522f
Don't print error if there are no parameters
jorisvandenbossche 5020d8f
fix signature for classes
jorisvandenbossche 2a1e89e
add check for mentions of NDFrame or IndexOpsMixin
jorisvandenbossche 7a71c22
use pydoc.getdoc to get the docstring (handles indentation)
jorisvandenbossche 9e436e5
updates
jorisvandenbossche File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it difficult to find the accessors that have been registered, instead of hardcoding them here? So we don't need to remember to change this when a new accessor is created.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I was looking into the class (eg that I could check they inherit from a base Accessor class, but that's not consistent between them).
So not really sure there is a better way, but totally agree it is not ideal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, there is a
_accessors
attribute. But not fully sure to what extent we can rely on that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem is then that I need to get the class (eg Series in case of pandas.Series.dt), which is also difficult to introspect. So maybe the easiest is to leave it as is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, it's quite useful as it is, we can improve it in the future if we find a way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI: #19963
I think
isinstance(object.__getattribute__(self, method_obj.__name__), CachedAccessor)
might have done it, But having an official registry is better :)