-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
BUG: Fixed timedelta numeric operations #18892
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -888,6 +888,19 @@ def test_nanstd_roundoff(self): | |
result = data.std(ddof=ddof) | ||
assert result == 0.0 | ||
|
||
def test_nanvar_timedelta(self): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I know this should be done up in |
||
result = pd.Series(dtype='m8[ns]').var() | ||
assert result is pd.NaT | ||
|
||
result = pd.Series([1, 1], dtype='m8[ns]').var() | ||
assert result == pd.Timedelta(0) | ||
|
||
result = pd.Series([10, 20], dtype='m8[ns]').var() | ||
assert result == pd.Timedelta(50) | ||
|
||
result = pd.Series([np.nan, 10, 20, np.nan], dtype='m8[ns]').var() | ||
assert result == pd.Timedelta(50) | ||
|
||
@property | ||
def prng(self): | ||
return np.random.RandomState(1234) | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a fix for 0.22? or for 0.23? (IOW do you need to have this for nansum)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was was specific to nanstd, so I think I can work around it. The skipna stuff affected all the ops I think. I'll see how hard that is to work around.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah rather leave this alone for now (IOW do it in 0.23).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rebase on master. can you move to 0.23 (docs were renamed), prob easiest to just check this file from master and past in new one