-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
CLN: Removed overridden Timedelta properties (#18242) #18374
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@@ -665,36 +665,6 @@ cdef class _Timedelta(timedelta): | |||
else: | |||
return "D" | |||
|
|||
@property | |||
def days(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
technically then won't self._sign
be wrong (not that we are actually using it here)? I guess this is ok
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only place where self._sign gets used is in _repr_base, which calls _ensure_components at the start of the method to set self._sign. That happens irrespective of the property definitions.
If _repr_base were ever re-factored in the future it could definitely be missed. OK to open a separate issue to see if we can refactor the _repr_base call and make it more "future-proof" by removing the need for self._sign altogether?
FWIW I checked the test cases and didn't see one that explicitly handles the repr of negative Timedeltas, so I'll add one and re-push
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Scratch my comment on not having test cases - you'll see some in test_arithmetic that ensure we have the appropriate Timedelta repr, so I'm not planning to re-push unless you have additional changes you'd like.
expected = TimedeltaIndex(['0 days', '-1 days', '-2 days'], name='bar') |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #18374 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.38% 91.38%
=======================================
Files 164 164
Lines 49797 49797
=======================================
Hits 45508 45508
Misses 4289 4289
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
thanks! |
git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff