Skip to content

remove have_setuptools branching #18349

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #18349 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #18349      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.38%   91.36%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         164      164              
  Lines       49790    49790              
==========================================
- Hits        45501    45492       -9     
- Misses       4289     4298       +9
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 89.17% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#single 39.49% <ø> (-0.07%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 25% <0%> (-58.34%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.8% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cfad581...0056568. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #18349 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #18349      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.38%   91.36%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         164      164              
  Lines       49790    49790              
==========================================
- Hits        45501    45492       -9     
- Misses       4289     4298       +9
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 89.17% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#single 39.53% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 25% <0%> (-58.34%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.8% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
pandas/core/internals.py 94.54% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cfad581...8ea38e8. Read the comment docs.

@gfyoung gfyoung added Build Library building on various platforms Clean labels Nov 18, 2017
msg = "C-source file '%s' not found." % (cfile) +\
" Run 'setup.py cython' before sdist."
msg = ("C-source file '{cfile}' not found. Run "
"'setup.py cython' before sdist.".format(cfile=cfile))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 - nice

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

I’m retroactively declaring this the first in a 4ish part sequence to transition to use cythonize.

setup.py Outdated
if not _have_setuptools:
sys.exit("need setuptools/distribute for Py3k"
"\n$ pip install distribute")
setuptools_kwargs = {'test_suite': 'nose.collector',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did you add nose.collector?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would completely remove this

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did you add nose.collector?

It was already there, just lower in the file.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know, but I don't think its needed. remove and let's see.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should have a test_requires, but that's separate. can you open an issue for that.

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #18448.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Nov 23, 2017

thanks

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the have_setuptools branch December 8, 2017 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Build Library building on various platforms Clean
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BLD: since we already use setuptools, let's remove the optional logic in setup.py
3 participants