-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
BUG: formating integers datetimes using sql GH17855 #17882
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0498dd1
BUG: formating integers datetimes using sql GH17855
drorata 385ad78
BUG: formating integers datetimes using sql GH17855
drorata e3a438b
Merge branch 'fix-17855' of github.com:drorata/pandas into fix-17855
drorata 26454e7
Merge branch 'master' of git://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into fix-…
drorata 102ab25
Improve fix as per discussion
drorata 5b56686
Improved testing
drorata 987f588
Fixed typo in SQL data setting
drorata File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add a comment as to why you are doing this logic branching (and reference issue number).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On a second thought, I think we can do this a bit cleaner like this:
So first check for the specific case of numeric values and no format -> parse as seconds. Then the format arg is checked for all possible values for
unit
. Once this check is passed, we don't need to check if '%' is in format anymore, as it can never be a valid unit (this has already been checked)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jorisvandenbossche But what about the case where the column consists of integers of the format
YYYYMMDD
or something similar? This is not a valid unit and has to be formatted using%
(e.g.%Y%m%d
).If the format string contains
%
it means that the user knows something about the data and this knowledge has to be used.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you specify
format="%Y%m%d"
, the column will be parsed with thatformat
in the snippet above (only the specific recognized units specifiers are passed tounit
, otherwiseformat
is used)