Skip to content

BF: (re)raise the exception always unless returning #14756

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2016

Conversation

yarikoptic
Copy link
Contributor

coding logic flaw is obvious (leaves unser used later undefined), so no dedicated test was found

otherwise leads atm to masking of this error while testing on i386 and then failling with

UnboundLocalError: local variable unser referenced before assignment

More detail: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pandas&arch=i386&ver=0.19.1-1&stamp=1479504883

otherwise leads atm to masking of this error while testing on i386
and then failling since

UnboundLocalError: local variable unser referenced before assignment

More detail: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pandas&arch=i386&ver=0.19.1-1&stamp=1479504883
@jreback jreback added the Error Reporting Incorrect or improved errors from pandas label Nov 28, 2016
@jreback jreback added this to the 0.19.2 milestone Nov 28, 2016
@jreback jreback merged commit 2f43ac4 into pandas-dev:master Nov 28, 2016
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Nov 28, 2016

thanks!

jorisvandenbossche pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2016
…#14756)

otherwise leads atm to masking of this error while testing on i386
and then failling since

UnboundLocalError: local variable unser referenced before assignment

More detail: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pandas&arch=i386&ver=0.19.1-1&stamp=1479504883
(cherry picked from commit 2f43ac4)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Error Reporting Incorrect or improved errors from pandas
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants