Skip to content

BUG: fix pickling of Custom offsets in 3.6 #14685

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jreback
Copy link
Contributor

@jreback jreback commented Nov 18, 2016

xref #14679

@jreback jreback added Compat pandas objects compatability with Numpy or Python functions Python 3.6 labels Nov 18, 2016
@jreback jreback added this to the 0.19.2 milestone Nov 18, 2016
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 85.29% (diff: 100%)

Merging #14685 into master will increase coverage by <.01%

@@             master     #14685   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           140        140          
  Lines         50706      50708     +2   
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
+ Hits          43247      43250     +3   
+ Misses         7459       7458     -1   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 748000d...8ad212c

@jreback jreback closed this in bec5bdb Nov 18, 2016
jorisvandenbossche pushed a commit to jorisvandenbossche/pandas that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2016
xref pandas-dev#14679

Author: Jeff Reback <[email protected]>

Closes pandas-dev#14685 from jreback/offsets and squashes the following commits:

8ad212c [Jeff Reback] BUG: fix pickling of Custom offsets in 3.6

(cherry picked from commit bec5bdb)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Compat pandas objects compatability with Numpy or Python functions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants