BUG: Weighted rolling aggregations do not respect min_periods=0 #51449
Labels
Bug
Needs Triage
Issue that has not been reviewed by a pandas team member
Window
rolling, ewma, expanding
Pandas version checks
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.
Reproducible Example
Issue Description
When using weighted rolling aggregation and setting
min_periods
to0
does not work and it is treated asNone
. Aggregations without weight work as expected.Expected Behavior
Weighted and not-weighted rolling aggregations should behave the same way with
min_periods=0
and fillNaN
in the same positions.Installed Versions
commit : 2e218d1
python : 3.11.1.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Linux
OS-release : 5.10.102.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2
Version : #1 SMP Wed Mar 2 00:30:59 UTC 2022
machine : x86_64
processor : x86_64
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : C.UTF-8
LOCALE : en_US.UTF-8
pandas : 1.5.3
numpy : 1.24.1
pytz : 2022.7.1
dateutil : 2.8.2
setuptools : 66.1.1
pip : 22.2.2
Cython : None
pytest : 7.2.1
hypothesis : None
sphinx : None
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : None
html5lib : None
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : 3.1.2
IPython : 8.8.0
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : 4.11.1
bottleneck : None
brotli : None
fastparquet : None
fsspec : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : 3.6.3
numba : None
numexpr : None
odfpy : None
openpyxl : None
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : 10.0.1
pyreadstat : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : 1.10.0
snappy : None
sqlalchemy : None
tables : None
tabulate : None
xarray : None
xlrd : None
xlwt : None
zstandard : None
tzdata : None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: