We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
>>>pd.period_range('1350-01-01', '1350-01-02', freq='6h').sort_values() PeriodIndex(['1350-01-01 23:00', '1350-01-01 05:00', '1350-01-01 11:00', '1350-01-01 17:00', '1350-01-02 23:00'], dtype='period[6H]', freq='6H')
Though sorted, '1350-01-01 23:00' still locates the first.
>>>pd.period_range('2150-01-01', '2150-01-02', freq='6h') PeriodIndex(['2150-01-01 00:00', '2150-01-01 06:00', '2150-01-01 12:00', '2150-01-01 18:00', '2150-01-02 00:00'], dtype='period[6H]', freq='6H')
And why this starts at 00:00, but the former one starts at 23:00?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey, thanks for your report. This is actually a duplicate of #36294 and will be fixed with #36557
Sorry, something went wrong.
Hi, is this actually a duplication?
>>>pd.period_range('1400-01-01', '1400-01-02', freq='6h') PeriodIndex(['1400-01-01 00:00', '1400-01-01 06:00', '1400-01-01 12:00', '1400-01-01 18:00', '1400-01-02 00:00'], dtype='period[6H]', freq='6H')
It seems to be normal though '1400' is also a pre epoch.
Thanks! @phofl
You are right, may be unrelated, but is fixed on master.
Sorry for the confusion: This is a duplicate of #36430 and was fixed by #36535
great
close
No branches or pull requests
Though sorted, '1350-01-01 23:00' still locates the first.
And why this starts at 00:00, but the former one starts at 23:00?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: