BUG: Inconsistent behavior of index values for `DataFrame.apply` and `Series.apply`

[YarShev]

• I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.

• I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.

• (optional) I have confirmed this bug exists on the master branch of pandas.

---

Note: Please read this guide detailing how to provide the necessary information for us to reproduce your bug.

Code Sample, a copy-pastable example

import pandas as pd
pdf = pd.DataFrame([[4, 9]] * 3, columns=['A', 'B'])
pdf.apply(["sum", lambda df: df.sum(), lambda df: df.sum()]) # lambdas have postfix 0, 1 ...
             A   B
sum         12  27
<lambda_0>  12  27
<lambda_1>  12  27
s = pd.Series([4] * 3)
s.apply(["sum", lambda df: df.sum(), lambda df: df.sum()]) # lambdas have not postfix 0, 1 ...
sum         12
<lambda>    12
<lambda>    12
dtype: int64

Problem description

Could anyone explain please? Is it normal behavior? Why DataFrame's index has postfix for lambdas, but Series's index hasn't. The same behavior is observed for agg. There is no such behavior in pandas==1.0.5.

Output of pd.show_versions()

pandas : 1.1.1
numpy : 1.18.4
pytz : 2020.1
dateutil : 2.8.1
pip : 20.1.1
setuptools : 41.2.0
Cython : None
pytest : 5.4.2
hypothesis : None
sphinx : None
blosc : None
feather : 0.4.1
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : 4.5.0
html5lib : None
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : 2.11.2
IPython : 7.14.0
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : 4.9.1
bottleneck : None
fsspec : 0.7.3
fastparquet : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : 3.2.1
numexpr : 2.7.1
odfpy : None
openpyxl : 3.0.3
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : 0.16.0
pytables : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : 0.4.2
scipy : 1.4.1
sqlalchemy : 1.3.17
tables : 3.6.1
tabulate : None
xarray : 0.15.1
xlrd : 1.2.0
xlwt : None
numba : None

[phofl]

Hi,

thanks for your report.

This was introduced with 0534b00

@charlesdong1991 do you remember, why this was not added for Series too?

[charlesdong1991]

In this case, index shouldn't change for dataframe, Series behaviour should be correct IMHO which means no suffix.

I think this line should be moved back to groupby/generic.py and then should be all good:

pandas/pandas/core/aggregation.py

Line 89 in 8c7efd1

func = maybe_mangle_lambdas(func)

I can come up with a small patch for this hopefully on Thursday when I have some free time. i think the issue can be fixed in 1.1.3.

I just tested a bit, seems okay, set to WIP first in case any other tests fail.

[charlesdong1991]

take

[YarShev]

@charlesdong1991 , thanks a lot!

[simonjayhawkins]

In this case, index shouldn't change for dataframe, Series behaviour should be correct IMHO which means no suffix.

to clarify, the DataFrame index is incorrect and should be the same as 1.0.5 and should be labelled as a regression?