We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[X ] I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
[X ] I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
(optional) I have confirmed this bug exists on the master branch of pandas.
Note: Please read this guide detailing how to provide the necessary information for us to reproduce your bug.
import numpy as np import pandas as pd ser = pd.Series(data=['n1', 'n2', 'n0', 'n4', 'n2', 'n1', 'n0', 'n3'], name='ser') for _ in range(3): np.random.seed(42) print(ser.value_counts()) print(ser.value_counts(sort=False))
The output of this file changes from one run to another. This creates a randomality which cannot be reproduced by np.random.seed(..).
Due to this randomality, the code cannot be made reproducible.
This non-reproducibility happens only from one run to the other; the loop in the code shows that the output is repeated exactly within the same run.
The code shows that the non-reproducibility happens both with value_counts(sort=True) (default value) and value_counts(sort=False).
Should be the same from one run to another.
This could be related to #32514 or #32449 but I do not quite understand this.
pd.show_versions()
commit : f2ca0a2 python : 3.6.10.final.0 python-bits : 64 OS : Linux OS-release : 4.15.0-112-generic Version : #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 machine : x86_64 processor : x86_64 byteorder : little LC_ALL : None LANG : en_US.UTF-8 LOCALE : en_US.UTF-8 pandas : 1.1.1 numpy : 1.19.1 pytz : 2020.1 dateutil : 2.8.1 pip : 20.2.2 setuptools : 49.6.0 Cython : None pytest : None hypothesis : None sphinx : None blosc : None feather : None xlsxwriter : None lxml.etree : None html5lib : None pymysql : None psycopg2 : None jinja2 : None IPython : None pandas_datareader: None bs4 : None bottleneck : None fsspec : None fastparquet : None gcsfs : None matplotlib : None numexpr : None odfpy : None openpyxl : None pandas_gbq : None pyarrow : None pytables : None pyxlsb : None s3fs : None scipy : 1.5.2 sqlalchemy : None tables : None tabulate : None xarray : None xlrd : None xlwt : None numba : None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
np.random.seed is not used for hashing at all
you can set PYTHONHASHSEED for deterministic hashing between runs of the interpreter: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30585108/disable-hash-randomization-from-within-python-program
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
[X ] I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
[X ] I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
(optional) I have confirmed this bug exists on the master branch of pandas.
Note: Please read this guide detailing how to provide the necessary information for us to reproduce your bug.
Code Sample, a copy-pastable example
Problem description
The output of this file changes from one run to another. This creates a randomality which cannot be reproduced by np.random.seed(..).
Due to this randomality, the code cannot be made reproducible.
This non-reproducibility happens only from one run to the other; the loop in the code shows that the output is repeated exactly within the same run.
The code shows that the non-reproducibility happens both with value_counts(sort=True) (default value) and value_counts(sort=False).
Expected Output
Should be the same from one run to another.
Note
This could be related to #32514 or #32449 but I do not quite understand this.
Output of
pd.show_versions()
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : f2ca0a2
python : 3.6.10.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Linux
OS-release : 4.15.0-112-generic
Version : #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020
machine : x86_64
processor : x86_64
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : en_US.UTF-8
LOCALE : en_US.UTF-8
pandas : 1.1.1
numpy : 1.19.1
pytz : 2020.1
dateutil : 2.8.1
pip : 20.2.2
setuptools : 49.6.0
Cython : None
pytest : None
hypothesis : None
sphinx : None
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : None
html5lib : None
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : None
IPython : None
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : None
bottleneck : None
fsspec : None
fastparquet : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : None
numexpr : None
odfpy : None
openpyxl : None
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : None
pytables : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : 1.5.2
sqlalchemy : None
tables : None
tabulate : None
xarray : None
xlrd : None
xlwt : None
numba : None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: