Skip to content

DOC: Remove and disable wiki #30410

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
datapythonista opened this issue Dec 22, 2019 · 5 comments · Fixed by #47277
Closed

DOC: Remove and disable wiki #30410

datapythonista opened this issue Dec 22, 2019 · 5 comments · Fixed by #47277

Comments

@datapythonista
Copy link
Member

I've been having a look at the pages on the GitHub wiki, and I think the content is mostly outdated, not very useful, and in some cases opinionated and not specific to pandas.

Not sure if there is anything worth keeping. But if there is, its not much, and I think it should be moved to the docs, so it's more visible, and we can open PRs on it, to update or delete the content.

Once the content we want to keep is in the docs, I'd diable the wiki. Personally I don't see any use case for it in our l project. The docs can contain everything.

Any objection? Anything that someone wants to keep?

@datapythonista datapythonista added Docs Needs Discussion Requires discussion from core team before further action labels Dec 22, 2019
@alimcmaster1
Copy link
Member

FYI there is an effort to move some of the content across:
#30232

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

I think the only part that has been used / updated the last years are the "maintainers" pages. Although some of them are now also outdated with the https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas-release repo.

Some of the maintainers info like the "Benchmark machine" page might be fine to keep in the wiki?

@souvik3333
Copy link
Contributor

I was working on #30232 but stopped working after knowing some content of wiki is not valid anymore. Please let me know or update the #30232 and I can move them from wiki to contributing.

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

+1, recently looked at it for the first time in a while and saw stuff about nose-based testing

@afeld afeld added good first issue and removed Needs Discussion Requires discussion from core team before further action labels Mar 25, 2021
@afeld
Copy link
Member

afeld commented Mar 25, 2021

Not hearing any objection, so changed the labels to reflect that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants