You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the version 9.1, when we are concatenating pandas.Series, we would expect the columns name of the created DataFrame to be the ones of the Series which were concatenated together. Nevertheless the series' names are lost, and the columns are simply 0, 1, 2 ...
* commit 'v0.10.0b1-65-g6cadd6c':
BUG: workaround numpy issue in 1.6.2 on certain distros
BUG: use "for" as keyword to test against
ENH: option names must valid, non-keyword python identifiers
TST: option names must valid, non-keyword python identifiers
BUG: make sure pd.options style access triggers warnings and callbacks as needed
ENH: provide attribute style access to options via pd.options
REF: rename option key "print" to "display"
BUG: use Series name attributes for colnames in concat with axis=1. closepandas-dev#2489
ENH: add max_cols as keyword in DataFrame.info pandas-dev#2524
BUG: allow users to set the max number of columns before per column info is hidden away pandas-dev#2524
BUG: DataFrame.from_dict does not work with dict of sequence and orient=index pandas-dev#2496
ENH: df.select uses bool(crit(x)) rather then crit(x)
DOC: add FAQ section on monkey-patching
BUG: diff should cast n to int pandas-dev#2523
In the version 9.1, when we are concatenating pandas.Series, we would expect the columns name of the created DataFrame to be the ones of the Series which were concatenated together. Nevertheless the series' names are lost, and the columns are simply 0, 1, 2 ...
Error shown below:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: