-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
ERR: lib.is_xyz_array errors, some ignored #18064
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
Milestone
Comments
lib.is_xyz_array
errors, some ignored
this fixes
|
4 tasks
jreback
added a commit
to jreback/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Nov 12, 2017
jreback
added a commit
to jreback/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Nov 12, 2017
jreback
added a commit
to jreback/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2017
jreback
added a commit
to jreback/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2017
jreback
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2017
No-Stream
pushed a commit
to No-Stream/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
See #18054
The closest thing to good news is that most of these functions are not used very much (at least not outside of inference.pyx, where maybe they behave better because of [mumble]). Four of them are explicitly tested in tests.dtypes.test_inference (is_datetime_array, is_datetime64_array, is_timdelta_array, is_timedelta64_array). Other than that, its just two uses of is_bool_array (core.common, core.internals) and one of is_datetime_array (in core.indexes.base)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: