-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
Concat single series along columns returns a DataFrame #17952
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I wouldn't except this to do anything else. if you want to add some docs go for it. this is long estallished behavior. |
TomAugspurger
added a commit
to TomAugspurger/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2017
For a single Series. Closes pandas-dev#17952
I agree, I think this is the sensible thing to do. |
TomAugspurger
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2017
* DOC: Document return type from concat For a single Series. Closes #17952 * Reword
peterpanmj
pushed a commit
to peterpanmj/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Oct 31, 2017
* DOC: Document return type from concat For a single Series. Closes pandas-dev#17952 * Reword
No-Stream
pushed a commit
to No-Stream/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2017
* DOC: Document return type from concat For a single Series. Closes pandas-dev#17952 * Reword
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This came up in dask, I wanted to confirm whether or not it's intentional before dask mirrors pandas:
I think it's fine for
concat(..., axis=1)
to always return a DataFrame, but we should document that.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: