Dataframe constructor misinterprets columns argument if nested list is passed in as the data parameter.

[madphysicist]

This issue is based on Stack Overflow question http://stackoverflow.com/q/40182072/2988730.

A small, complete example of the issue

df = pd.DataFrame([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]],
                  index=[['gibberish']*2, [0, 1]],
                  columns=[['baldersash']*3, [10, 20, 30]])

The result is

  File "<ipython-input-321-2695882ac68b>", line 3, in <module>
    columns=[['baldersash']*3, [10, 20, 30]])

  File "/home/jfoxrabi/miniconda3/lib/python3.5/site-packages/pandas/core/frame.py", line 263, in __init__
    arrays, columns = _to_arrays(data, columns, dtype=dtype)

  File "/home/jfoxrabi/miniconda3/lib/python3.5/site-packages/pandas/core/frame.py", line 5352, in _to_arrays
    dtype=dtype)

  File "/home/jfoxrabi/miniconda3/lib/python3.5/site-packages/pandas/core/frame.py", line 5431, in _list_to_arrays
    coerce_float=coerce_float)

  File "/home/jfoxrabi/miniconda3/lib/python3.5/site-packages/pandas/core/frame.py", line 5489, in _convert_object_array
    'columns' % (len(columns), len(content)))

AssertionError: 2 columns passed, passed data had 3 columns

Expected Output

            baldersash   
                    10 20 30
gibberish 0          1  2  3
          1          4  5  6

The surprising thing here is that any of the following seem to work just fine:

1. Supplying a numpy array as data:

   df = pd.DataFrame(np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]),
                     index=[['gibberish']*2, [0, 1]],
                     columns=[['baldersash']*3, [10, 20, 30]])

   Results in

               baldersash      
                       10 20 30
   gibberish 0          1  2  3
             1          4  5  6
   

2. Reducing the size of the input array to have two columns:

   df = pd.DataFrame([[1, 2], [3, 4]],
                     index=[['gibberish']*2, [0, 1]],
                     columns=[['baldersash']*2, [10, 20]])

   Results in

               baldersash   
                       10 20
   gibberish 0          1  2
             1          3  4
   

3. Omitting the columns argument:

   df = pd.DataFrame(np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]),
                     index=[['gibberish']*2, [0, 1]])

   Results in

                0  1  2
   gibberish 0  1  2  3
             1  4  5  6
   

4. Using a single-level list for the columns argument:

   df = pd.DataFrame(np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]),
                     index=[['gibberish']*2, [0, 1]],
                     columns=[10, 20, 30])

   Results in

                10  20  30
   gibberish 0   1   2   3
             1   4   5   6
   

Output of pd.show_versions()

## INSTALLED VERSIONS

commit: None
python: 3.5.2.final.0
python-bits: 64
OS: Linux
OS-release: 2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64
machine: x86_64
processor: x86_64
byteorder: little
LC_ALL: None
LANG: en_US.UTF-8

pandas: 0.18.1
nose: 1.3.7
pip: 8.1.2
setuptools: 25.1.6
Cython: 0.24.1
numpy: 1.11.1
scipy: 0.18.0
statsmodels: None
xarray: None
IPython: 5.1.0
sphinx: 1.4.1
patsy: 0.4.1
dateutil: 2.5.3
pytz: 2016.6.1
blosc: None
bottleneck: None
tables: None
numexpr: 2.6.1
matplotlib: 1.5.1
openpyxl: 2.3.5
xlrd: None
xlwt: None
xlsxwriter: 0.8.4
lxml: 3.5.0
bs4: None
html5lib: None
httplib2: None
apiclient: None
sqlalchemy: None
pymysql: None
psycopg2: None
jinja2: 2.8
boto: None
pandas_datareader: None

[jreback]

you have several issues.

• nested lists are not meaningful for indexes. you generally want a MultiIndex, which you need to explicitly create
• the data is 3 columns, 2 on the index (you have the reverse)

In [13]: pd.DataFrame([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]], columns=list('ABC'), index=['foo', 'bar'])
Out[13]:
     A  B  C
foo  1  2  3
bar  4  5  6

[madphysicist]

Then why do cases 1 and 2 work? The problem is that the behavior is inconsistent.

[jreback]

the shapes are correct there

[madphysicist]

Case 1 only differs from the "broken" case in that is passes in an ndarray for data instead of a nested list. The multiindex is passed in as a nested list. I do not think that the shape matches there (3 columns vs two element list). My question for that specific one is then how does the exact type of the input affect the way columns gets interpreted?

[jorisvandenbossche]

@jreback I didn't know you could pass a list of lists to represent a MultiIndex (like you would pass to MultiIndex.from_arrays, but in any case it works in certain cases and it not working in the certain example of @madphysicist is inconsistent:

• So passing a nested list or corresponding array as the data gives the same result

In [78]: pd.DataFrame([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]])
Out[78]: 
   0  1  2
0  1  2  3
1  4  5  6

In [79]: pd.DataFrame(np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]))
Out[79]: 
   0  1  2
0  1  2  3
1  4  5  6

• The same as above, but passing a nested list to index= -> nested list is interpreted as a MultiIndex:

In [82]: pd.DataFrame([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]], index=[['A', 'A'], ['a', 'b']])
Out[82]: 
     0  1  2
A a  1  2  3
  b  4  5  6

In [83]: pd.DataFrame(np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]), index=[['A', 'A'], ['a', 'b']])
Out[83]: 
     0  1  2
A a  1  2  3
  b  4  5  6

In [84]: pd.DataFrame(np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]), index=[['A', 'A'], ['a', 'b']]).index
Out[84]: 
MultiIndex(levels=[['A'], ['a', 'b']],
           labels=[[0, 0], [0, 1]])

• The same for columns= -> but now there is a difference between having a list vs array for the data:

In [80]: pd.DataFrame([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]], columns=[['A', 'A', 'A'], ['a', 'b', 'c']])
...
AssertionError: 2 columns passed, passed data had 3 columns

In [81]: pd.DataFrame(np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]), columns=[['A', 'A', 'A'], ['a', 'b', 'c']])
Out[81]: 
   A      
   a  b  c
0  1  2  3
1  4  5  6

[harri471]

take

[mroeschke]

The columns case looks to work on master now. Could use a test

In [16]: In [80]: pd.DataFrame([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]], columns=[['A', 'A', 'A'], ['a', 'b', 'c']])
Out[16]:
   A
   a  b  c
0  1  2  3
1  4  5  6

In [17]: pd.__version__
Out[17]: '1.3.0.dev0+1485.g6abb567cb1'

[madphysicist]

@mroeschke I tried with version 1.2.3 on Arch Linux and it worked fine. I'd be happy to add a test like my original example if you point me to where. It was interesting to see your message pop up. Took me a few minutes to figure out what it was about.