You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
pd.read_* functions can now also accept pathlib.Path, or py._path.local.LocalPath objects for the filepath_or_buffer argument. (GH11033)
all read_* functions should support pathlib.Path now. It works for me with read_csv but not for read_hdf.
Interestingly, I find in the squashed PR for this issue, 0d3dcbb, only a comment regarding read_csv and read_table, while the merge 82f0033 talks about read_*. Is there something missing for read_hdf ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jreback
added
Testing
pandas testing functions or related to the test suite
IO HDF5
read_hdf, HDFStore
Compat
pandas objects compatability with Numpy or Python functions
labels
Dec 6, 2015
yeh, this was not tested on all of the IO formats. pretty sure that csv/excel/stat/msgpack/json should work as they all use the same io calls. HDF uses a slightly different one as it doesn't support reading from buffers in the same way.
So need tests for each of these formats (and not just the IO call itself) on read/to
HDF test/fix
According to the Enhancements text for 17.1:
all read_* functions should support pathlib.Path now. It works for me with
read_csv
but not forread_hdf
.Interestingly, I find in the squashed PR for this issue, 0d3dcbb, only a comment regarding
read_csv
andread_table
, while the merge 82f0033 talks aboutread_*
. Is there something missing forread_hdf
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: