-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
Pandas.plot() fails to calculate the right xlims #11310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
Visualization
plotting
Comments
pls |
nmartensen
added a commit
to nmartensen/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Jun 5, 2017
* Do not assume that xdata is sorted. * Use numpy.nanmin() and numpy.nanmax() instead.
nmartensen
added a commit
to nmartensen/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Jun 10, 2017
* Do not assume that xdata is sorted. * Use numpy.nanmin() and numpy.nanmax() instead.
nmartensen
added a commit
to nmartensen/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Jun 10, 2017
* Do not assume that xdata is sorted. * Use numpy.nanmin() and numpy.nanmax() instead.
nmartensen
added a commit
to nmartensen/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Jun 10, 2017
* Do not assume that xdata is sorted. * Use numpy.nanmin() and numpy.nanmax() instead.
nmartensen
added a commit
to nmartensen/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Jul 19, 2017
* Do not assume that xdata is sorted. * Use numpy.nanmin() and numpy.nanmax() instead.
nmartensen
added a commit
to nmartensen/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2017
* Do not assume that xdata is sorted. * Use numpy.nanmin() and numpy.nanmax() instead.
TomAugspurger
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 19, 2017
* BUG: set correct xlims for lines (#11471, #11310) * Do not assume that xdata is sorted. * Use numpy.nanmin() and numpy.nanmax() instead. * BUG: Let new MPL automatically determine xlims (#15495) * Avoid setting xlims since recent matplotlib already does it correctly * and we should let it apply its default styles where possible * TST: plotting: update expected results for matplotlib 2 Matplotlib 2.0 uses new defaults that cause some of our tests to fail. This adds appropriate new sets of expected results to the following tests in tests/plotting/test_datetimelike.py: test_finder_daily test_finder_quarterly test_finder_annual test_finder_hourly test_finder_minutely test_finder_monthly test_format_timedelta_ticks_narrow test_format_timedelta_ticks_wide * TST: plotting: Relax some tests to work with matplotlib 2.0 Matplotlib 2.0 by default now adds some padding between the boundaries of the data and the boundaries of the plot. This causes some of our tests to fail if we don't relax them slightly. modified: pandas/tests/plotting/test_datetimelike.py test_irregular_ts_shared_ax_xlim test_mixed_freq_regular_first test_mixed_freq_regular_first_df test_secondary_y_irregular_ts_xlim test_secondary_y_non_ts_xlim test_secondary_y_regular_ts_xlim modified: pandas/tests/plotting/test_frame.py test_area_lim test_line_lim modified: pandas/tests/plotting/test_series.py test_ts_area_lim test_ts_line_lim * TST: Add lineplot tests with unsorted x data Two new tests check interaction of non-monotonic x data and xlims: test_frame / test_unsorted_index_lims test_series / test_unsorted_index_xlim * DOC: lineplot/xlims whatsnew entry for v0.21.0
alanbato
pushed a commit
to alanbato/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Nov 10, 2017
* BUG: set correct xlims for lines (pandas-dev#11471, pandas-dev#11310) * Do not assume that xdata is sorted. * Use numpy.nanmin() and numpy.nanmax() instead. * BUG: Let new MPL automatically determine xlims (pandas-dev#15495) * Avoid setting xlims since recent matplotlib already does it correctly * and we should let it apply its default styles where possible * TST: plotting: update expected results for matplotlib 2 Matplotlib 2.0 uses new defaults that cause some of our tests to fail. This adds appropriate new sets of expected results to the following tests in tests/plotting/test_datetimelike.py: test_finder_daily test_finder_quarterly test_finder_annual test_finder_hourly test_finder_minutely test_finder_monthly test_format_timedelta_ticks_narrow test_format_timedelta_ticks_wide * TST: plotting: Relax some tests to work with matplotlib 2.0 Matplotlib 2.0 by default now adds some padding between the boundaries of the data and the boundaries of the plot. This causes some of our tests to fail if we don't relax them slightly. modified: pandas/tests/plotting/test_datetimelike.py test_irregular_ts_shared_ax_xlim test_mixed_freq_regular_first test_mixed_freq_regular_first_df test_secondary_y_irregular_ts_xlim test_secondary_y_non_ts_xlim test_secondary_y_regular_ts_xlim modified: pandas/tests/plotting/test_frame.py test_area_lim test_line_lim modified: pandas/tests/plotting/test_series.py test_ts_area_lim test_ts_line_lim * TST: Add lineplot tests with unsorted x data Two new tests check interaction of non-monotonic x data and xlims: test_frame / test_unsorted_index_lims test_series / test_unsorted_index_xlim * DOC: lineplot/xlims whatsnew entry for v0.21.0
No-Stream
pushed a commit
to No-Stream/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2017
* BUG: set correct xlims for lines (pandas-dev#11471, pandas-dev#11310) * Do not assume that xdata is sorted. * Use numpy.nanmin() and numpy.nanmax() instead. * BUG: Let new MPL automatically determine xlims (pandas-dev#15495) * Avoid setting xlims since recent matplotlib already does it correctly * and we should let it apply its default styles where possible * TST: plotting: update expected results for matplotlib 2 Matplotlib 2.0 uses new defaults that cause some of our tests to fail. This adds appropriate new sets of expected results to the following tests in tests/plotting/test_datetimelike.py: test_finder_daily test_finder_quarterly test_finder_annual test_finder_hourly test_finder_minutely test_finder_monthly test_format_timedelta_ticks_narrow test_format_timedelta_ticks_wide * TST: plotting: Relax some tests to work with matplotlib 2.0 Matplotlib 2.0 by default now adds some padding between the boundaries of the data and the boundaries of the plot. This causes some of our tests to fail if we don't relax them slightly. modified: pandas/tests/plotting/test_datetimelike.py test_irregular_ts_shared_ax_xlim test_mixed_freq_regular_first test_mixed_freq_regular_first_df test_secondary_y_irregular_ts_xlim test_secondary_y_non_ts_xlim test_secondary_y_regular_ts_xlim modified: pandas/tests/plotting/test_frame.py test_area_lim test_line_lim modified: pandas/tests/plotting/test_series.py test_ts_area_lim test_ts_line_lim * TST: Add lineplot tests with unsorted x data Two new tests check interaction of non-monotonic x data and xlims: test_frame / test_unsorted_index_lims test_series / test_unsorted_index_xlim * DOC: lineplot/xlims whatsnew entry for v0.21.0
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
While working with cyclic data, Pandas failed to calculate the right limits for the plot. I am not sure which exact characteristic of my data causes the problem, but I will observe if further when I have time for it. Until then, here is the notebook in which the error occurred:
http://nbviewer.ipython.org/gist/AKuederle/d7837facee0479beb6cf
The first plot is the pandas plot, which has the wrong x-limits.
The second plot is the same (or at least I thought) the same plot using matplotlib directly.
The third plot shows, that it padas issue is indeed the x-limits and not something else in plotting process
Edit:
Used package Versions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: